Investigating commitment flexibility in multi-agent contracts
نویسنده
چکیده
Reputation and commitment are important issues for automated contracting. Levelled commitment contracts, i.e. contracts where each party can decommit by paying a predetermined penalty, were introduced to allow self interested agents to accommodate events that unfolded since the contract was entered into. Various approaches to modelling reputation have been explored, allowing an agent to make decisions after considering not only current opportunities, but also possible longer term (social) implications of maintaining a reputation for reliability in contract fulfilment. An agent may consider both its own reputation for honesty and the past behaviour of others. We explore a combination of these issues in the context of a simple contracting scenario. Analytical and simulation results are presented. Theme area: empirical evaluation
منابع مشابه
Using Option Pricing to Value Commitment Flexibility in Multi-agent Systems1
With the explosive growth of internet activity, there will be an increasing reliance on intelligent software agents for electronic commerce and information retrieval. Such multi-agents systems will be comprised of self-motivated agents that interact with each other though negotiation and task delegation. Multi-agent technology models and facilitates these interactions through automated contract...
متن کاملA simulation approach to design contracts that govern emergent multi-agent systems
Agent-based normative systems offer the potential for a business to model, understand the consequences of, and then refine contracts to improve the outcomes for that business. In this paper, we combine a simulation technique designed for investigating and tuning emergent behavior in multi-agent systems with an approach to modeling norms of the complexity found in business contracts. We believe ...
متن کاملSurplus Equivalence of Leveled Commitment Contracts
In automated negotiation systems consisting of self-interested agents, contracts have traditionally been binding. Leveled commitment contracts — i.e., contracts where each party can decommit by paying a predetermined penalty — were recently shown to improve expected social welfare even if agents decommit strategically in Nash equilibrium. Such contracts differ based on whether agents have to de...
متن کاملOn the Value of Commitment Flexibility in Dynamic Task Allocation via Second-Price Auctions
Motivated by multi-agent systems applications, we study a task allocation problem in a competitive environment with multiple self-interested autonomous agents. Tasks dynamically arrive to a contractor that oversees the process of task allocation. Tasks are auctioned to contractees, who submit prices they require to accept tasks. The agent with the lowest bid wins but is rewarded with the second...
متن کاملInvestigating the Effective Factors on Self-Control in the Operational Supervision System of Participatory Contracts
The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors affecting self-control and its evaluation in the operational supervision system of participatory contracts. In this study, by combining the Herzberg theory and the belief system, a conceptual model consisting of five stages in the four supervisory levels of the bank is presented. In this research, a survey method is used to measure self-contr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001